Scott McClellan: Well, how ABOUT those oaths!?!

Well, I haven't read Scotty's "tell some" book yet, but the brief bits of substance that have trickled out of the missing-in-action media have left me "puzzled" indeed.

Here's what I'm "puzzled" about.

First, why was the press secretary "not in the mainstream"?.

Howcome Congress has never been "making good progress" towards impeaching the Cheney/Bush Administration?.

Sure, we all know that "war is hard," and that "no one suffers the pain of our dead soldiers' families like George and I do," according to the White House, but why no press challenges to this propaganda. (War is not hard; war is lethal, deadly, murderous. War, when you're killing off women and children and old men, is state-sanctioned terrorism.)

The barrage of "puzzlement" about Scott's book by members of the criminals in the C/B admin leaves me wondering why they still think Americans and the American press are stupid and will swallow this, um, codswallop. Ohh, yeah. Right. They/we still are swallowing it.

So far as I've heard, no reporters have asked the contumelious choristers questions like: "Were you 'puzzled' that Cheney fired Powell, Zinni, Garner after they had "shared their reservations and concerns" about Cheney/Shrub policy with members of the White House mafia?

And how about this question, which to me is the nil and ens, the A and Ω, the beginning and end, be-all and end-all, whole ball of wax, enchilada, nine (cubic) yards, etc., of public service: Why did you not honor your oath of office? You swore (or affirmed) to "support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Cheney, oops--domestic."

Then the follow up: Have you ever read the US Constitution, either before or after you took that oath to defend it?

Finally: Don't these latest "revelations in print" about the unconstitutional activities of the cheney/shrub administration provide sufficient ammunition to blow the Members of Congress off their backsides and move to impeachment? 

I mean, really! When is enough enough for these pusillanimous oath-takers? Do they need anything else to prompt them to honor their own oaths of office?

And as a perhaps completely moot matter: Are these things ol' goodbody Patrick J. Fitzgerald knew about and did nothing about in the face of that knowledge? Or did Cheney & Shrub — our Unitary Liar-In-Chief, don't forget — just lie to Fitzie? 

At least Henry Waxman's interested. Me too. Anyone else curious?

And will anyone have the moxie to subpoena Acting President Cheney and the ULIC to testify before Congress? (Ohhh, forgot: Executive barricade. Stand-up Moslers. Disk-wipers. Stonewalls.)

Sphere: Related Content